Call recordings

The organization shall determine and document details about the acquisition and selection of data used in AI systems, including provenance and consent where applicable.

The organization shall document the provenance of data used in AI systems to enable evaluation and traceability.

Privacy risk of the AI system – as identified in the MAP function – is examined and documented. Privacy examination covers what the AI system makes possible, inference and re-identification from training data and outputs, not only the lawfulness of the input data.

High-risk AI systems that make use of techniques involving the training of AI models shall use training, validation and testing data that meet the quality criteria in Art.10(2)-(5): appropriate data governance, examination for possible biases, identification of data gaps/shortcomings, statistically relevant datasets to the intended purpose, and considerations specific to the geographical, contextual, behavioural or functional setting of intended use.

Process personal data only where at least one lawful basis applies: the data subject's consent, necessity for a contract with the data subject or pre-contractual steps at their request, compliance with a legal obligation, protection of vital interests, performance of a public interest task or exercise of official authority, or legitimate interests that are not overridden by the data subject's interests, rights and freedoms. Public authorities cannot rely on legitimate interests for processing carried out in performance of their tasks. Where the basis is legal obligation or public task, that basis must be laid down in Union or Member State law and the purpose must be determined in it. Before processing for a purpose other than the one collected for, without consent or a legal mandate, assess compatibility against the link between the purposes, the context of collection, the nature of the data, the consequences for the data subject and the safeguards in place.

Where processing rests on consent, be able to demonstrate that the data subject consented. Where the consent request forms part of a wider written declaration, present it in a manner clearly distinguishable from the other matters, in an intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language. Inform the data subject before consenting that consent may be withdrawn at any time, make withdrawal as easy as giving consent, and treat processing carried out before withdrawal as still lawful. Consent is not freely given where performance of a contract, including provision of a service, is made conditional on consent to processing that the contract does not require.

Where personal data is collected from the data subject, provide at the time it is obtained the identity and contact details of the controller and any representative, the contact details of the data protection officer, the purposes and the legal basis, the legitimate interests where that is the basis, the recipients or categories of recipient, and any intention to transfer to a third country with the existence or absence of an adequacy decision and, for Article 46, 47 or 49(1) transfers, reference to the safeguards and how to obtain a copy. Provide in addition the storage period or the criteria used to determine it, the existence of the rights of access, rectification, erasure, restriction, objection and portability, the right to withdraw consent where consent is the basis, the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority, whether providing the data is a statutory or contractual requirement and the consequences of not providing it, and the existence of automated decision-making including profiling with meaningful information about the logic involved and its significance and envisaged consequences. Before further processing for a new purpose, provide that purpose and the further information first.

Processing is lawful only if at least one basis applies: consent for specific purposes, contract with the data subject, legal obligation, vital interests, a public task laid down in domestic law or relevant international law (section 9A of the 2018 Act), a recognised legitimate interest, or legitimate interests not overridden by the data subject's interests, rights and freedoms (particularly where the data subject is a child). Neither legitimate-interest basis is open to public authorities performing their tasks. A recognised legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(ea)) applies only where a condition in Annex 1 is met: disclosure on request to a body that states it needs the data for a public task, national security, public security or defence, responding to an emergency, detecting or preventing crime or prosecuting offenders, and safeguarding a vulnerable individual (under 18, or 18 or over and at risk); no balancing test is required for these. Article 6(11) gives direct marketing, intra-group transmission for internal administration and network and information security as examples of processing that may be necessary for legitimate interests, which still need the balancing test.

Where processing rests on consent the controller must be able to show the data subject consented. A consent request inside a written declaration covering other matters must be clearly distinguishable, intelligible, easily accessible and in plain language, and any part that infringes the Regulation does not bind. The data subject may withdraw consent at any time, must be told so before consenting, and withdrawing must be as easy as giving consent; withdrawal does not undo earlier lawful processing. Whether consent is freely given takes utmost account of whether a contract or service is made conditional on consent to processing the contract does not need. Consent to an area of scientific research counts as consent where the conditions in Article 4(6) are met.

Whether processing for a new purpose is compatible with the purpose of collection is decided by weighing, among other things, the link between the purposes, the context of collection and the relationship with the data subject, the nature of the data (special category or criminal offence data), the possible consequences, and safeguards such as encryption or pseudonymisation. Further processing is treated as compatible where the data subject consents to a specified, explicit and legitimate new purpose; where it is research, archiving or statistics under Article 84B; where it ensures or demonstrates compliance with Article 5(1); where an Annex 2 condition is met (disclosure on request for a public task, archiving disclosures of consent-based data, public security, emergencies, crime, vital interests, safeguarding vulnerable individuals, tax, legal obligations); or where it is necessary for an Article 23(1)(c) to (j) objective and authorised by law. Data collected on consent may be reused only with fresh consent or for compliance, or under Annex 2 or an authorised objective where consent cannot reasonably be sought.